We certainly noticed that the 3000 sounds nicer than its predecessor, but particularly enjoyed the much-reduced load times when inserting a USB, or loading a track laced with memory and hot cues – great for quick mixes. We certainly noticed that the 3000 sounds nicer than its predecessor, but particularly enjoyed the much-reduced load times when inserting a USB, or loading a track laced with memory and hot cuesĪs well as redesigned analogue and digital output circuits, the internal processing has been beefed up, with two multi-core processors driving a 32-bit float/96kHz audio engine that promises clearer sound quality than before. We also liked the three-band waveform option, which shows you the loudness of each frequency band of a track, in a similar way to Denon’s Prime series. When you’re in the mix, the new screen offers much more comprehensive waveform views than before, with the clunky four beat marker bars from the previous model – used to show how tightly in time the track is with the one playing from another deck – being replaced with a zoomable second track waveform, allowing you to see precisely where the two tracks being mixed sit in relation to each other. (Image credit: Future) Performance and verdict
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |